Priced like a controls product, not a logging meter
Annual platform fee based on payment decisions monitored and the depth of controls, governance, and export workflows your reviewers require.
Starter
Pass your first partner review
For teams preparing for their first sponsor bank or enterprise diligence review
- Advisory mode
- 1 production environment
- OFAC screening (built-in SDN)
- Standard evidence retention
- JSON + CSV audit export
- Human / API / workflow initiation tracking
- Readiness assessment support
- Email support
Growth
Survive an examiner call
For teams running live payments who need blocking, escalation, and examiner-ready exports
- Everything in Starter
- Blocking mode + escalation workflows
- Multiple environments + integrations
- Role-based access (compliance, risk, audit)
- Approval and override lineage
- Examiner packet export
- Independent verification proof
- OpenTelemetry / trace linking
- AI agent initiation tracking
- Advanced alerting + webhooks
Enterprise
Prove it to anyone
For multi-rail programs with OCC/FinCEN examination exposure, GDPR obligations, and enterprise procurement requirements
- Everything in Growth
- Extended evidence retention
- Custom policy + controls mapping
- Partner diligence + incident exports
- GDPR / SAR / redaction workflows
- Case management / GRC integrations
- Security review + procurement terms
- Dedicated support + SLAs
- Policy-bound autonomous execution support
- Custom verification / export requirements
Why teams invest before they feel “big enough”
- Launch reviews stall on missing evidence
- Hours reconstructing each incident
- Spreadsheets and screenshots for diligence
- Manual responses to partner questionnaires
- Launch reviews close with structured evidence packets
- Incident reconstruction in seconds, not hours
- Examiner-ready exports replace ad hoc collection
- Diligence responses backed by verifiable evidence
What evidence fragmentation actually costs
| Manual evidence assembly | With Kontext | |
|---|---|---|
| Examiner prep time | Days to weeks per request | Minutes per packet |
| Systems reconciled per review | 5–8 disconnected tools | 1 structured record |
| Average enforcement penalty (FinCEN 2025) | $12.7M | — |
| Compliance team time on “human ETL” | 60%+ of working hours | Automated at capture |
Deploying autonomy into payment flows?
Kontext helps teams preserve the decision evidence needed when AI agents recommend, initiate, or execute payment actions.
Plans scale with controls maturity
| Capability | Starter | Growth | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enforcement | Advisory | Advisory + Blocking | Blocking + custom escalation |
| Evidence retention | Standard | Extended options | Custom retention windows |
| Export types | JSON / CSV | Examiner packets | Diligence, incident, redacted |
| Approval workflows | Basic thresholds | Approval lineage | Custom approval mapping |
| Verification | Included | Third-party proof | Custom verification support |
| Governance | Basic controls | Redaction support | GDPR / SAR workflows |
| Interoperability | Core integrations | OTel + webhooks | GRC / case systems |
Can't find what you're looking for? Check the docs or get in touch.
Be ready to explain every payment decision
See how Kontext creates an audit-defensible evidence trail for programmable payments.